Angielski.edu.pl

The rules are simple: I will give you a question, next person will reply and post a new question, and the next person replies and posts another question. I need to improve the way of asking questions and I am sure you will joing my game

The questions may be about everything.
For example: What's your favourite day of the week? Have you ever considered moving to a different country? What would you do if you met Barack Obama? Can you tell me what is the capital of Canada?
Briefly saying, there is no bound.

Are you ready to start a game?? Yes? OK! Let's start

My question is:
How did you find out about this website?

I found this website accidently on the Internet a long time ago.

What is your favourite book ?

It's Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maud Montgomery.

If you were short-sighted, do you think you would prefer wearing contact lenses to glasses?

I would prefer to wear contact lenses because I look awful in glasses.

How do you spend your free time?

I go out with my friends and read a lot.

Have you recently read any English book that is worth recommending ?

Yes.

What do you do when you don't know what to do?

I play computer games or search some funny pictures in the Internet.

Have you ever eaten something rotten? What was it?

Yes,when I was a child I ate a rotten apple..I made a bet that I would eat it.

Do you intend to take part in the elections to the European Parliament?

Yes,but I have no idea for whom I will vote.

How many children would you like to have?

Two, a boy and a girl.

In which country you would like to live the most? (of course after Poland

)

I'd like to live in UK the most, but I'm afraid it is impossible.

What do you do after badly arguing with your lover?

Damp him/her and get the new one.

oh, i see there's no question. So maybe i will continue.
What would you do if You found out tommorow is the end of the world? (Not serious answers are acceptable

)

I would kill myself to be faster than the end of the world.

What would you do realizing that your partner isn't hetero? (Considering the fact that you are, if not change this question for yourself)

Souhlasedm s P. Brezinou. Teorie mi pżĂ´ipade1 hodnżĂľ odtrżÄşene1 od reality, i po tom, co pedżĄe J. JożĄt. Ale to je v urżÄitfdch ekmcooinkfdch kruzedch dost obvykle9. :-)PżŻvodnedm proble9mem je, żÄşe farme1żĂ´ovi vedlejżĄedm efektem nżĂľżÄed żÄinnosti (z nedżÄş farme1żĂ´ żÄşe1dne9 vfdhody neme1, ani se nejedne1 o vfdsledek trżÄşned konkurence nebo technicke9 inovace) vznikla żĄkoda. Pokud żĄkodu nenahraded żÄşeleznice, farme1żĂ´ bude muset pro pżĂ´edżĄtżĂľ zaplatit żÄşeleznici prevenci, cożÄş ho opżĂľt bude nżĂľco ste1t. Snad se żÄşeleznice opravdu spokojed se zaplacenedm ne1kladżŻ na ta zażĂ´edzened zvfdżĄenfdch o nżĂľjakou zcela nepatrnou żÄe1stku....Ale spedżĄ bych se jeżĄtżĂľ zamyslel nad tedm, kterfd ze subjektżŻ bude medt pżĂ´i vyjedne1ve1ned silnżĂľjżĄed pozici a bude si moci spedżĄe diktovat podmednky. żÄekl bych, żÄşe ten, kterfd se1m o sobżĂľ nic platit nemused a mżŻżÄşe toho druhe9ho, kterfd me1 ze1jem pżĂ´edejedt jemu vznikajedcedm żĄkode1m, trochu vyżÄşdedmat.Jak se s tedm asi Coase vyrovne1? Nijak, protożÄşe to je z jeho pohledu irelevantned. Nicme9nżĂľ pak oprvdu nevedm, prożÄ by se jeho teoreticky hezkfd model mżĂľl jakkoli promedtat do reality, kdyżÄş s ned neme1 te9mżĂľżĂ´ nic spoleżÄne9ho.

Souhlasedm s P. Brezinou. Teorie mi pżĂ´ipade1 hodnżĂľ odtrżÄşene1 od reality, i po tom, co pedżĄe J. JożĄt. Ale to je v urżÄitfdch eomioknckfdch kruzedch dost obvykle9. :-)PżŻvodnedm proble9mem je, żÄşe farme1żĂ´ovi vedlejżĄedm efektem nżĂľżÄed żÄinnosti (z nedżÄş farme1żĂ´ żÄşe1dne9 vfdhody neme1, ani se nejedne1 o vfdsledek trżÄşned konkurence nebo technicke9 inovace) vznikla żĄkoda. Pokud żĄkodu nenahraded żÄşeleznice, farme1żĂ´ bude muset pro pżĂ´edżĄtżĂľ zaplatit żÄşeleznici prevenci, cożÄş ho opżĂľt bude nżĂľco ste1t. Snad se żÄşeleznice opravdu spokojed se zaplacenedm ne1kladżŻ na ta zażĂ´edzened zvfdżĄenfdch o nżĂľjakou zcela nepatrnou żÄe1stku....Ale spedżĄ bych se jeżĄtżĂľ zamyslel nad tedm, kterfd ze subjektżŻ bude medt pżĂ´i vyjedne1ve1ned silnżĂľjżĄed pozici a bude si moci spedżĄe diktovat podmednky. żÄekl bych, żÄşe ten, kterfd se1m o sobżĂľ nic platit nemused a mżŻżÄşe toho druhe9ho, kterfd me1 ze1jem pżĂ´edejedt jemu vznikajedcedm żĄkode1m, trochu vyżÄşdedmat.Jak se s tedm asi Coase vyrovne1? Nijak, protożÄşe to je z jeho pohledu irelevantned. Nicme9nżĂľ pak oprvdu nevedm, prożÄ by se jeho teoreticky hezkfd model mżĂľl jakkoli promedtat do reality, kdyżÄş s ned neme1 te9mżĂľżĂ´ nic spoleżÄne9ho. http://arqinvwc.com olvccbytfy [link=http://qoilueipux.com]qoilueipux[/link]

Coaseho teorâĘŠm je v tomto podâĄnââ opravdu pochopitelnâÄš i pro studenty niżÄşżĄââ ch rożÄnââ kżŻ topââ cââ ch se jeżĄtżĂľ ve vlnâĄch żÄeskâĘŠ beletrie:)Ale, je skuteżÄnżĂľ tak "vedlejżĄââ ", kdo zaplatââ tżĂľch 50 babek? TeorâĘŠm si dokâĄżÄşu pżĂ´edstavit aplikovanâÄš u soudu nebo ve sprâĄvnââ m żĂ´ââ zenââ . Je primâĄrnââ m âÄźżÄelem tohoto żĂ´ââ zenââ rozsoudit âÄźżÄastnââ ky, nebo najââ t żĂ´eżĄenââ , kterâĘŠ je ekonomicky nejvâÄšhodnżĂľjżĄââ pro spoleżÄnost (hroznâĄ formulace:) a pak nechat âÄźżÄastnââ ky sporu si o tżĂľch padesâĄt dolarżŻ hodit korunou?Toto żÄâĄsteżÄnżĂľ souvisââ se zajââ mavou otâĄzkou, kterou jsme żĂ´eżĄili se Stevem Terretem, lektorem v Cambridge diploma in Eng and Europ law. Zda apelażÄnââ soud vynâĄżĄââ rozsudek pżĂ´edevżĄââ m proto, aby posoudil konrâĘŠtnââ odvolâĄnââ nebo primâĄrnżĂľ proto, aby pro futuro v râĄmci ratio decidendi vyreżĄil "important point of law". odpovżĂľżżš byla nâĄsledujââ cââ :"So it is not correct to say that the Court of Appeal needed to decide “deciding wheter specificly mr. Collins was aware or not of his trespassing…”. The only question the Court of Apeal needs to ask itself is: “When the jury decided that Mr Collins has trespassed, did they do so on the basis of a proper description of the law of trespass – as told to them by the trial judge?”Ifthe answer is “no”, the jury’s decision is not safe and the appeal would be allowed. In that sense, the Court of Appeal’s judgment has 2 functions: A “precedent” functionThe Court of Appeal’s judgment (or HL’s) will answer a particular legal question referred to it from a lower court (e.g. What does trespass mean in s.9 of the Theft Act 1968?). The definition the higher court provides will crfeate a precedent which will be used by lower courts in future cases (and by lawyers and law students when discussing that area of law) An “individual function”The individual(s) involved in the first-instance trial in which the legal question arose (e.g. Mr Collins) have a “personal” interest in the answer provided by the higher court. Once the higher court has given its answer, this will impact upon whether the lower court decided the case properly. It may result in the trial court’s decision being overruled (as it was in the Collin case)." cheap insurance report auto insurance